![]() The Absolute Sound was founded after Harry Pearson was unhappy with the sound quality of the Bose 901's he purchased. It's likely that the Bose 901's spatial performance, in a well configured environment, is also enhancing the perceived sound quality despite the frequency response irregularities. Science has shown us that listening in stereo can make it harder to hear differences between speakers (as compared to mono). In a way, it sounds like a Magnepan without a true ribbon with less transparency and much more bass. When compared to a traditional audiophile system, I would describe the Bose as a third spatial presentations beyond headphones or dynamic speakers. When appropriately compared to a lifestyle speaker peer, I can confidently state that I prefer the 901's sound presentation over a Sonos speaker or Devialet Phantom. For all the harassment that Bose received from audiophiles, especially in the era of the Acoustimass 5, the actual in-room sound quality of the Bose 901 can best described with a simple "Wow." Maybe it was because my expectations were so low going into my listening tests, or I've simply lost my audiophile credibility card or suffer from early dementia, but I thoroughly enjoyed the in-room experience from the 901. I recently tried a Series VI in my own home and came around incredibly impressed with the audio. In Erin's measurements, he noted that the equalizer added an extreme level of distortion. The Bose 901 Series V has been measured on the Klippel NFS. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |